The Internet, the final frontier. These are the voyages of a student in the lands of wild, wild cyberspace. Her one term mission: to explore strange new sites and learn more about this place. To seek out new ways of speaking and new virtual realities. To boldly go where milllions have gone before.

Tuesday, October 04, 2005

LiveJournal (LJ) is a mixed bag of mixed genres sharing one (sometimes creatively created) workspace. The user can spend an unlimited amount of their time discussing politics, abortion, gay rights, sports, religion, the latest fandom kernuffle, and harassing non-Firefly folk to go and see Serenity (because Joss Whedon needs your money love). But when you first come upon LJ, you don't really get a hold of any of the above, instead, you meet and greet a homepage with Frank the Goat on it and maybeperhaps a feature that tells you the improvements done to the site in the last previous month.

But what you don't see is the vast (very, very vast) topics and discussions being brought up on a daily basis that fits in the many different genres and discourse displayed in Kress's Multimodality, Multimedia, and Genre article.

LJ falls into the wonderous category of the blog. With a blog, a user can express their various and complicated emotions within an entry and let hundreds of other complicated emotional individuals see (that is if it isn't friends or private locked) their words. The user has free range of dissucussing whatever topics they choose to discuss because, hey, half of them paid for the webspace and they have that right. But the individual that views their emotional rant about, lets say - abortion and why it should be illegal - has that right to argue their position for pro-choice.

The social relations on LJ is complicated itself. Unless the particular entry itself is 'private', anyone can read what you're writing. And since LJ is basically anonymous, there are users who feel as if they have free will to say whatever they have to say. I myself have a LJ and I feel as though my LJ self is much freer than who I am in reality. Sure, I'm sharing myself with the 60 people on my friendslist and others who wander innocently onto my ramblings, but I feel as though I'm talking to and for myself. It's a small little place where I can express my opinions openly and not be all that nervous about sharing them.

You see, in the LJ world, even if you manage to anger someone and the both of you have a falling out, you can easily cut them out from your LJ life and never see them again. In the amusing world of reality, you'll just constantly bump into them over and over again.

The social relation could at times be at ease, but at other times, tense. But for the most part, the world of LJ is a place where new ideas, worlds and genres can open up and thoughts are here anew.

2 Comments:

Blogger S. Chandler said...

I checked out LJ and read a bunch of entries. Have you checked out the users at this site? I wonder if there are demographic differences -- like the users at this site are older or younger, more or less involved as professionals or academics -- I wonder if different sites, for some reason or another, attract different kinds of "groups" so that they really are communities in the sense that the wiki entry was pointing out that you can't have in cyberspace. Curious.

So what kinds of social relationships are structured by blogs? What Discourse are they within( diary? op ed piece? personal essay? letter? a little from each?) how is it changed in that it is not only public but interactive AND (as you point out) anonymous?

Do you think anyone has created a blog with the name and picture of someone they don't like, and carried on distastful rants? Or do you think people are more interested in living their own lives than in fooling someone else?

Lots of intersting ideas in your post. I think the one about the fact that you can cut cyber-friends out of your life with ease is significant -- and suggests something about the kinds of relationships blogs structure.

6:33 PM

 
Blogger Nadia said...

Ryan: We sort of play gods in our blog/personal websites don't we?

Yup, we do. *head fills with righteous authority*

Dr. Chandler: Have you checked out the users at this site? I wonder if there are demographic differences -- like the users at this site are older or younger, more or less involved as professionals or academics -- I wonder if different sites, for some reason or another, attract different kinds of "groups" so that they really are communities in the sense that the wiki entry was pointing out that you can't have in cyberspace. Curious.


Livejournal seems to attract many sorts of demographics. At least two on my friends' list are teachers. One works in the criminal justice field and two are publishing books.

I think a survey was down a couple years back and it was found that LJ usually attracts users who are in their teenage years. Teenagers at age 16 outrank any other age group.

For me, LJ creates a community in which I could easily find a group of people that share my interests. I form my friends' list around the interests I like.

So what kinds of social relationships are structured by blogs? What Discourse are they within( diary? op ed piece? personal essay? letter? a little from each?) how is it changed in that it is not only public but interactive AND (as you point out) anonymous?

LJ is like a little of the four you listed. Some users use it as a 'personal' diary detailing each and every detail they lived that day. Others share their opinions on particular subjects that are an interest to them (i.e. the Bush administration). Still some use it to detail essays in their particular fandom (i.e. the dynamics between Harry Potter and Draco Malfoy and why they represent the good and evil in human nature. That could be an example essay). And then there are those who propose or share letters they want to write and send or what they got from a company, friend, etc.

LJ keeps it's anonymous mask by letting your identity without anyone knowing who exactly you are. My LJ represents me. Well, the part of me that I'm not too shy to show. I publically discuss the Bush administration and my opinions about the subject. I present all of my views in a public forum so others who happen upon my journal could join in the discussion. But the thing is, no one really knows who I am. They don't know Nadia Lahens. But they do know my user name, which really, they could attach opinions on. But users could always delete one user name and start anew with another if they feel as though that user name left too much of a bad taste in LJ world.

Do you think anyone has created a blog with the name and picture of someone they don't like, and carried on distastful rants? Or do you think people are more interested in living their own lives than in fooling someone else?

Actually, there have been people who do so. Some of them are called 'sock puppets'. The user then goes around and flames the user they don't like. Some even form hateful essays in their blog about a specific user. If the user knows the person in real life, they sometimes create communities (heh - there actually are communities named communities. http://www.livejournal.com/~comic_foxtrot is a community).

Then we have those that create a new user name different than their own to get a new identity. Recently, a woman, who writes slash fiction (that's fiction about same sex couples) posed as a gay male to publish her stories on LJ. Her ordinary LJ identity got found out and was basically ran out of LJ land. At least underneath that particular user name.

12:46 PM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home